Public and Private Blockchains

The key distinction between public and private blockchains is access. A public blockchain is completely open, allowing anyone to participate in or audit its activities. It is truly a decentralized, authority-free operation. A private or "permissioned" blockchain, on the other hand, controls who p...

archive2 min read

The key distinction between public and private blockchains is access. A public blockchain is completely open, allowing anyone to participate in or audit its activities. It is truly a decentralized, authority-free operation. A private or "permissioned" blockchain, on the other hand, controls who participates and who can view transactions, allowing only selected and verified participants to execute consensus protocols and maintain the shared ledger, for example.

The key distinction between public and private blockchains is access. A public blockchain is completely open, allowing anyone to participate in or audit its activities. It is truly a decentralized, authority-free operation. A private or "permissioned" blockchain, on the other hand, controls who participates and who can view transactions, allowing only selected and verified participants to execute consensus protocols and maintain the shared ledger, for example.

In addition, the owner of a private blockchain can override, edit or delete entries on the blockchain; whereas entries on a public blockchain are immutable.

Main differences:

Public Blockchain

Private Blockchain

Decentralized peer-to-peer network

Not decentralized because mining capabilities and the system of consensus are centralized in the owner/operator's hands

Data modification is not possible (immutability)

Owner/operator may modify data

Anyone can join the network

Only selected/verified participants can join the network

Anonymous participants

Identified participants

No access control for sensitive information

Security and confidentiality

Each node keeps the replica of the blockchain

Scope of replication depends of the network and its rules

Proof of Work or Proof of Stake mechanism

More complicated consensus algorithm, sometimes based on the user role

Relatively slow

Relatively fast

Significant power consumption

Lower power consumption

What Our Clients Say

  • Your team has provided us with outstanding service and outcomes. We couldn't be happier with your work or our progress. All of the members of your team have each shown themselves experts in their respective areas and have been a pleasure to work with.

    Ben Melton

    Product Owner at CapStorm

    Read case study →
  • The partnership, commitment, and skill of the Softjourn team enabled us to navigate this product transformation effectively.
    Eric Rauch

    Eric Rauch

    Co-Founder of Pivot, Pivot

    Read case study →
  • The Softjourn team was very quick to response to issues as well. I'm happy with the result.

    Mike Kenefsky

    Operations Director at PM Vitals, PM Vitals

  • Softjourn's pragmatic approach spotted potential blockers early on, ensuring we stayed on track.
    Sam Mogil

    Sam Mogil

    CEO & Co-Founder, SquadUP

    Read case study →
  • Softjourn's pragmatic approach spotted potential blockers early on, ensuring we stayed on track.
    Richard Bates

    Richard Bates

    Director of Product at Spektrix, Spektrix

    Read case study →
  • Wonderful work on our platform – everything looks great, and you did such a great job!

    Myers-Briggs

    Team Leaders, Myers-Briggs

    Read case study →

Partnership & Recognition

Want to Know More?

Fill out your contact information so we can call you